IS CNN'S LARRY KING VINDICATING BIOPRO OR EXPOSING A SCAM!

CNN's Larry King- May 27th, 2008: "Do Cell Phones Cause Cancer?"

This "hype" story from CNN's Larry King Live exposes biopro's fraudulent claims contradicting the FDA that cell phones are unsafe. Based on the lack of evidence about cell phones, the fact the FDA is ensuring cell phones are NOT dangerous and all this exposed in this CNN story you also have to conclude that biopro's claims behind their products are an even greater false and unsubstantiated scam. After you see this story or read the transcripts we are going to show you the complete hype being created and an ironic twist of karma for biopro.

In a quick setup to our points, there was one biopro cool-aid sounding doctor in the interview, Dr. Khurana. He spouted all the same biopro training propaganda of an epidemic greater in scale than the dangers of cigarettes. This man's unfounded and speculative self proclaimed "findings" has contributed to the biopro fuel and has been used by biopro to support their theory of EMF dangers so as to market, sell and exploit the American consumer for their own greed. You will find all over the Web stories published about this man's speculations of cell phone dangers but all in specific language such as; "there is a significant and increasing body of evidence for a link between mobile phone usage and certain brain tumors". Notice he does not say; "there is absolute evidence"? In all the published readings we have found this doctor is slick with his words, as slick as biopro which make us believe their is some link between the two. Keep vigilant about how this doctor, others like him and biopro use their words; possible, growing evidence (not absolute evidence), can double the risk (not IS doubling the risk) and more deliberately deceptive play on words. You also need to know that this is one man. Their are many other experts that not only disagree with this doctor but have their own findings which is in direct contradiction to Khurana. Here is a statement; Late last week, the Mobile Operators Association dismissed Khurana's study as "a selective discussion of scientific literature by one individual". It believes he "does not present a balanced analysis" of the published science, and "reaches opposite conclusions to the WHO and more than 30 other independent expert scientific reviews".

The lawyer, Joanne Suder, well she exposes her own personal desire and obvious agenda within her argument to sue the next big trumped up scam. The problem the doctor and this lawyer is going to have is defending their views against the majority. A majority which is supported by the National Cancer Institute as well as many other very reputable organizations. CNN's guest doctors were all affirming our point that their are no positive links to tumors caused by cell phones or that there is an EMF epidemic. All of the lawsuits have been dismissed or thrown out due to a lack of concrete evidence. Now let's break this 1 hour story show you the truth in their own words.


The Story
Please take the time to read the complete CNN transcript via our link above or none of what we are going to expose here will make sense.

• The first outrageous statements reveling how lame these correlation attempts are came from Joanne Suder, an attorney of course; "After Dr. Newman was diagnosed and began treatment, his own physicians made the correlation between his longtime cell phone use and his cancer." This is NOT scientific evidence! This is an OPINION, a very dangerous one at that! She goes on to state; "He also has documented, unfortunately, nine years of a vast amount of cell phone use, and his terminal tumor is located in the exact anatomical location where the radiation from the cell phone emitted into his skull." Again, this is NOT scientific evidence! This is a lawyer trying to make a case!

Larry goes on to ask if they are up against it in their case based on the lack of concrete evidence and points out that 8 or 9 years ago Larry had on his show someone who lost a lawsuit based on this same premise. Joanne responds with two points so lets break them down in real terms because she is inadvertently exposing the truth we have been exposing on our Blog.

• Joanne responds; "Larry, when you say the lack of concrete evidence, that to me is really outrageous, because, number one, the field of brain tumors is not telecommunications, it's medical oncology."

What is outrageous in this statement she gives is the total ignoring of and denial of ALL the medical oncology except what fits her agenda. The only "lack of concrete evidence" is in the "view" showing correlations. It is irresponsible to take a single side to a "theory" and turn it into an agenda for personal gain which is exactly what she does. This is also what biopro is doing by taking this point of view and creating a so called solution to an issue that also can't be proven.

Blinded by her agenda, her follow up statement validates our point. She incites that its the level of the accusation that's more important and should be considered more factual than science!

• Joanne's second point; "Number two, whenever you're dealing with scientists, they're always going to tell you something is possible. You know, they want a mathematical certainty, and we are dealing with a law case, and under the law it's -- it is a preponderance of the evidence, and clearly in this case, all of the evidence excludes any other cause of cancer and points only to the radiation, and the industries own self studies that they funded also prove that there is a correlation, a high degree of correlation. between brain tumors and excessive cellular use." What!? Yes Joanne, in science something IS always "possible" but it is through science we establish known facts or a "majority" consensus accepted as fact! To use your own language, it is the preponderance of evidence, the very evidence that does not exist in your argument! So no, it is NOT clear or does your statement show ANY evidence cell phone use caused this cancer. If it were true the majority if not all the doctors on the show and in the medical community would have provided the absolute proof in which they did not! In fact, these doctors reaffirmed our point there is no, none, zero, NADA evidence that can link cell phone EMF to brain tumors and cancer.
  

• Then Larry King asks the typical leftist "rope-a-dope" question; "So there's no doubt that there is radiation in the cell phone?". any 5th grader could have asked this and is an obvious attempt to make this a story Larry wants. Larry is showing his bias being on the side of the lawyer and accuser and vacant of any balance. Thank God the doctors kept driving their point of no evidence or Larry and this lawyer would have tried the cell phone industry right on the show.

Unprofessional statements like this from people with way too much influence and blatant agendas in mass media is dangerous and a crime! This was an absolute attempt to fuel an unprovable idea in which companies like biopro and crackpot lawyers could use to exploit.

Mr. Newman sites his usage which amounted to an average cell phone user. Bellow average for teenager's that are now well into their adult years giving them a solid 10 years of cell phone use; "where is the epidemic biopro"? Wouldn't the epidemic already start to appear with hundreds of thousands of people especially from those of us whom have been using them for 20 years or more? We do know cell phones have been in public use long enough to show a link if it were true. According to biopro, kids are the most vulnerable because they still have "developing skulls" and their undeveloped heads allow more cell phone radio waves to penetrate. So it goes without saying this group could be showing signs in less than 10 years? We don't see an epidemic because this is all just more bullshit to push a false product for profit!

Joanne states she has never owned a cell phone and will not until they are safe. Hey Joanne! Give biopro a call because they can make your cell phone safe! Well let's be clear here... the "cell phone" will not be safer because the biopro science does not work like that. It only works with your body like kryptonite to Superman. The phone is kryptonite and their products are charged with Area 51 technology which makes you stronger than Superman. You will have to allow biopro to explain since they are the ones that made this shit up. We also suggest that you have a scientist with you as an interpreter as well as to test their products to make sure they work and if you do find they work please send us the evidence!

Larry King took a propaganda page right out of the biopro handbook by letting callers call in and give "testimonials". Biopro is famous for using this type of propaganda when explaining their science. This is the lowest form of "insinuation cloaked as validation".

Motorola and Verizon provided their statements as well. Of course the nut bags that still believe in biopro's conspiracy theories of a cover-up shunned this; but for the rest of us we got validation the right people in both the medical industry and the Government are doing their jobs to protect us. All sighting evidence from absolutely credible medical organizations confirming cell phones are safe.

In Perspective
This all just wreaks of a new Global Warming platform to exploit the public. We know this as fact because Alfred Hanser floated the G.W. comparison balloon to a cell phone safety epidemic in several biopro meetings. We are witnessing the creation of the next Global Warming hysteria which can only be interpreted as an assault on America by purely greedy exploiters. Exploiters of our open and free market economy, our law and our way of life. The "sky is falling" types like biopro and their attacks on "big evil corporate America" while at the same time big evil corporate biopro markets themselves as some sort of solution to their claimed dangers of cell phones and yet is immune to being one of these corporations is outrageous! For all the sleazy trial lawyers this is just a new ambulance to chase and exploit!

The truth is, biopro and the owners are just opportunists that seen a topic which fits their history of MLM fraud and as the good marketers they are took advantage by exploiting it for their own personal gain. They cloaked themselves via their marketing as good and honest people just trying to help "save the children" and MADE UP a product and science to package their fraud. Our society and culture unfortunately has become accustomed to pointing their fingers at someone or something to blame even if the evidence doesn't exist. The only thing worse than finger pointers are those people that see an opportunity to exploit the situation and ripoff those vulnerable to believing it.